Falls asleep at her post. On one of the most important cases being heard in years, the Texas Redistricting case. Note Scalia and Roberts comments to the plaintiff, who argues that redistricting somehow shouldn't depend on electoral outcomes. ??? How did this get so far up the court food chain? Oh yeah, some people are unhappy the voters haven't continued to elect their party, that's right.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060302/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_texas_redistricting_12
Thursday, March 02, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment